|
|
|
|
Dialing in the dialectic Hegel's dialectic is a way of thinking that detours one from arriving at or understanding the truth. It was used on a young Karl Marx and it turned him into a monster. The young Hegelian's used his dialectic process to criticize what they considered to be irrational, outmoded, or repressive. Their assault was directed against the foundations of Christianity and Marx folded unable to withstand their numerous arguments, and he was turned. This is what we see today being used out in the open on the public. The Hegelian dialectic is like being hypnotized, it stops one from thinking. The majority of the social media, mediaites and those governing from the left are under its spell. They cannot see or hear facts or change their minds because it ruins ones way to think critically, (and it is not the only way being used) If you wonder why people cannot see the obvious, this is why. Our synapses, neurons create pathways in the brain, repetition is what trains us how to think. Routing over and over what is false, and lies instead of truth creates a mind that has dull and diminished thinking. It destroys what we know as common sense. New neurological pathways are made, and once they are forged the person views things differently, they become changed overnight. That is why when someone is slain in the Spirit, an unbiblical experience that it is made to be the power of the Spirit when they they come up changed from lying down. The more people hear what is false the more they are convince that what is false is true, that is advertising. And it is very difficult to restore them to what they once accepted as true. This is what we see in cults that convince people they alone have the truth, even when they are shown what the believe is not the truth. This has people follow personalities instead of the actual substance they speak. This concept of rerouting one to a false conclusion came from Georg Hegel, a German occultist who conceived this mind-changing dialectic process. His diabolical philosophy fueled Karl Marx's anti-Christian fervor -- and also gave Lenin and Stalin their key weapon in their war against Christianity ( from crossroad.to) “Praxis was later developed in the early 20th century by socio-psychologists (Transformational Marxists) such as Georg Lukacs, Karl Korsch, and Antonio Gramsci” (Vol. 1 No. 1, 1996, The Dialectic & Praxis: Diaprax and the End of the ages by Dean Gotcher). Hegel’s ideas are used abundantly, applied to various facets of life, psychology, religion, education and history. This method has a veneer of logic, but it really is relativism, for it avoids truth. Hegel’s dialectic is logic used illogically. Truth becomes an abstract concept under the Hegelian Dialectic. Consensus or synthesis is at the core of the Hegelian Principle. Agreement of two opposing parties is the object of this principle. What praxis is about is exactly what the New age movements goals are, unlearning your traditional values - to let go of what keeps you from moving toward the new paradigm, whatever it may be. The New age agenda, and globalism is to have equity that will produce global harmony. The use of the word Diaprax, or Praxis it is simply another form for Hegel’s Dialectic. We may not be familiar with these terms but we need to be more familiar in identifying their work. If we can know how it works we can identify the process and not fall for its procedure. Dean Gotcher who has written extensively on this concept writes, “I call this liberal, New Age, socialist, mental disease diaprax (dia lectic + praxis). The dia lectic requires everyone using it to willingly question any absolute, prior established fact, or position. Prax is requires everyone to personally experience dialectic behavior in a facilitated, group-think environment where everyone must participate. Using diaprax leads to the abandonment of faith in overt authority (God, parent, teacher, nation, etc.), resulting in defiance against such authority. Using diaprax blinds the user of his dependence on covert authority, resulting in an addiction to covert authority rather than faith in overt authority” (Vol. 1 No. 1, 1996, The Dialectic & Praxis: Diaprax and the End of the Ages by Dean Gotcher). The Hegelian dialectical formula is--A (thesis) B (anti-thesis) equals C (synthesis). The result through the dialectic is to resolve the conflict of opposing views by coming to a new synthesis (the solution is considered a higher level of truth). The dialectic alters the thinking of the masses, from what is true to what is not. Truth is supposed to be in agreement with facts, reality. This change is accomplishedby redefining the problem to arrive at a synthesis. Which just so happens to always agree with their goals. They create the conflict and then bring the solution, this is Hegel’s dialectic in action, by employing this strategy you can arrive at a predetermined outcome. Group think REPLACES Analytical thinking. Hegel’s dialectic was at communism’s core to resolve what they saw as the problem of ‘class conflict’ and social justice. The goal of a revolution to overturn capitalism and replace it with communism. Marxism further invents the struggle between social classes. The divisions were labeled the bourgeoisie (capitalists), and the proletariat (workers) having them in opposition of each other. Many who disagreed understood it as making a two class system of the rich and pauper, with the elimination of the middle class. Hegel devised a method to resolve any disagreements and control the outcome. This process is what the radical left uses to control and manipulate outcomes by the media, as a consensus. Collectivism is chosen over Individualism, CONSENSUS (compromise). Lets look at some of the ways this has been used. example: If (A) my idea of freedom conflicts with (B) your idea of freedom then (C) neither of us can truly be free. Once you understand how this is implemented, you can identify it everywhere it is used. We are watching a constant barrage of anger and hate being stirring up the people, it is called weaponized information. This is done to make people react emotionally, diminishing the facts to use alternate opinions in mass causing confusion. This concept is a developed method that redefines truth; it removes one from absolutes and proposes that truth changes throughout history as peoples ideas and cultures change. We are seeing this being perpetrated on us to today with transgenderism, be tolerant. Reality of male and female are no longer valid. This is a continual process that is never stable because there are no absolutes. The old “truth” (thesis) is challenged by a “new concept” (antithesis), which changes ones thinking and the result births a new truth (synthesis), which becomes the new thesis for the next process that will bring more change. The change can be slight each time, as it moves the recipients over slowly to where the speaker wants them to be. Each process of change is subtly but actively pursued, until the arrived goal is finally reached. Each step along the way is a necessary component for the change. So the means to reach the goal is integrated in the continual process to achieve the goal. Again this goal does not have to have anything to do with truth but to convince one that what is false is truth. This is what we define as relativism (moral, spiritual etc.), its intention is to move people away from the truth. This is the vehicle by which people are influenced to change their currently held belief systems in order to come to new consensus, that which is not true. The means is tolerance must be involved. The main objective today is unanimity - unity, that is the goal, where we all agree. They define, and then redefine the problem and offer the solution. They will even create the conflict, which is the problem and claim they can bring the solution; this is Hegel’s dialectic in action. Once you understand how this is implemented, you can identify it everywhere it is used. In Marxism, freedom of speech cannot be allowed to operate or flourish because ‘the Capitalists’ (or whoever they oppose) might convert those listening because they can use facts, logic and reason to persuade people instead of Hegel’s dialectic to convince people by invalid theories. Major traditions of how to live, can be changes for example, morality can be dismantled, in its place is lawlessness, masquerading as the better way; a new, ameliorate standard of freedom. Here is an example of the dialectic: It was so peaceful, crime got out of hand, it was the police that caused the problem when they showed up and interfered. Is that what happened? No! It affects how we view the weakest, How you treat the young, the unborn and the elderly show where your society is. When The unborn and the old get murdered and there is barely a sound heard. If there is no protection or care for the weak and helpless then you know your humanity has diminished. What you will notice is that they ALWAYS accuse others of doing what they themselves are guilty of -- employing the Hegelian dialectic. Many unknowingly have willingly allowed the dialectic process to work on them. Others have no idea what is taking place. This is how the communists have used the “dialectic.” Implementing its principles they can move the masses into an alternate way to look at things and accept a new way to live. Real brainwashing is when you think it is your idea, your decision, you made it happen when you were really being manipulated.
|
|
