|
|
The Old or New Covenant?
The Law reference Guide The Law/The Book of The Law = 613 Commandment’s The ten commandments together, that are written on tablets are called “The Covenant/The Old Covenant” a Contract with Israel (only). Nine of which are Moral Law’s, One (The Sabbath) is the Sign of the Covenant. 603 other laws contain Civil Law’s, Ceremonial Law’s, also known as Statutes, Ordinances and Testimonies Collectively these 613 Command’s which are ALL called The Law Of Moses. (603 plus 10)The Old Testament law is never quoted or enforced for the believers in the New Testament after Christ ascends to heaven. What we find is the Scriptures saying that the law is put aside. This can only mean the Law of the Old Testament Col. 2:14-16. The commandments are only mentioned twice in New Testament; both times it states they are abolished! Heb. 8:13 In that He says, “A new covenant,” He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.” Law keepers claim that the 10 commandments are not the old covenant? That the old covenant that was abolished was not the Ten Commandments but are the Law of Moses; meaning the civil/ceremonial only. There is no Biblical support for this position ... The Bible clearly teaches that the Sabbath was part of the OLD Covenant. Read further for this to be proved. God said that I will make a new Covenant. Heb.8:7-8: “For if that first covenant had been faultless, then no place would have been sought for a second.” V.8 Because finding fault with them, He says: “Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah.” He’s saying the first covenant was not perfect and needed to be changed, replaced with another. The Bible says the 10 commandments ARE THE OLD COVENANT! Are the 10 different, separate from the rest of the Law of Moses or were they inclusive? This is the critical issue that needs to be seen so that one can know what is of the old covenant, and to know what is and what is not of the New Covenant. If confused about this you will not understand what is to be put aside or carried over to practice in the New Testament covenant. This is not something that takes long tedious hours of studying in the Scriptures to understand, all one needs to do is read it! Take a few scriptures at face value... Exodus 31:16-18 “Therefore the children of Israel shall keep the Sabbath, to observe the Sabbath throughout their generations as a perpetual covenant. ‘It is a sign between Me and the children of Israel forever; for in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, and on the seventh day He rested and was refreshed.”’ And when He had made an end of speaking with him on Mount Sinai, He gave Moses two tablets of the Testimony, tablets of stone, written with the finger of God.” Exodus 34:27-28: “Then the Lord said to Moses, “Write down these words, for
in accordance with these words I have made a covenant with you and with Israel.”
So he was there with the Lord forty days and forty nights; he did not eat bread or
drink water. And he wrote on the tablets the words of the covenant, the Ten
Commandments.” The 10 commandments are the Old Testament covenant. Deuteronomy 4:13: “So He declared to you His covenant which He
commanded you to perform, that is, the Ten Commandments; and He wrote them
on two tablets of stone.” The tablets of stone are the Old covenant. Deuteronomy 9:9: “When I went up to the mountain to receive the tablets of
stone, the tablets of the covenant which the Lord had made with you, then I
remained on the mountain forty days and nights; I neither ate bread nor drank water.
V.11 “And it came to pass, at the end of forty days and forty nights, that the LORD
gave me the two tablets of stone, the tablets of the covenant.” 1 Kings 8:9,21: vs.9 There was nothing in the ark except the two tablets of stone
which Moses put there at Horeb, where the Lord made a covenant with the sons of
Israel, when they came out of the land of Egypt.” ... V21 “And there I have set
a place for the ark, in which is the covenant of the Lord, which He made with
our fathers when He brought them from the land of Egypt.” 2 Chronicles 6:11: “And there I have set the ark, in which is the covenant of the Lord, which He made with the sons of Israel.” Crystal Clear isn’t it, the tablets are the old covenant. How do we know? God said so! They are the Old Covenant. So there should be no argument from a reading of the Word of God interpreting itself on this crucial matter. Now that we have established what is the old covenant we can go on developing our
understanding what is the Book of the law. God's concern was that Israel should keep His covenant by not breaking the laws
and incur punishment. He wanted to bless them. Ex.31:16: God commanded Moses to write down the words of
the law and he delivered it to the Levites. (In Deut.29:1 it states, “These are
the words of the Covenant…besides the covenant made in Horeb.” (There were
additions made in Moab for the land) Deut.31:26: “Take this Book of the Law, and put it beside the ark of the
covenant of the LORD your God, that it may be there as a witness against you;”
Moses would refer to the book of the law (covenant) for the simple reason it
included the 10. Exod.24:7 Then he took the Book
of the Covenant and read in the hearing of the people. And they said, “All
that the LORD has said we will do, and be obedient.” Here we have the first
mention of this book of the Covenant which certainly would include the 10
Commandments which are the Covenant. The peoples response shows us it had to be
included for them to obey all that the Lord had said. Deut.28:15 we will obey all
his commandments not just the 10. For them to do this it had to be in what Moses
wrote. Everything God spoke is a commandment not just what he wrote. What Moses required
is called “God's commandments.” (Deut. 28:1, 15) Num. 15:40: “and that you may
remember and do all My commandments, and be holy for your God.” Deut. 6:25
'Then it will be righteousness for us, if we are careful to observe all these
commandments before the LORD our God, as He has commanded us. Deut 11:22,13:18 ;
Josh 22:5: “But take careful heed to do the commandment and the law which Moses
the servant of the LORD commanded you, to love the LORD your God, to walk in all
His ways, to keep His commandments.” 2 Chron.7:9 the 10 commandments do not have numbers, that is a tradition of man,
none are greater or lesser, they are a unit. Did God speak the other 603 laws to
Moses besides writing the 10? Yes. Are not these not also commandments? Yes!
Does
God say obey all my commandments? Yes! This is why we are either under the old or
new covenant. One cannot abolish parts of it, either it is all put aside or none of
it is. It's not a question of which old covenant laws to keep, but which
covenant we are to observe. God told Moses that all of His words (moral, civil, ceremonial, etc.) were to be
given as commandments to Israel, as a covenant between God and Israel, it was all
one
unit and it was all the law of Moses. Lev. 27:34: “These are the
commandments which the LORD commanded Moses for the children of Israel on Mount
Sinai.” II King 23:3: “Then the king stood by a pillar and made a covenant
before the LORD, to follow the LORD and to keep His commandments and His testimonies
and His statutes, with all his heart and all his soul, to perform the words of
this covenant that were written in this book. “ Here we see that the covenant
was written in the book which is the 10 commandments. Does anyone in the Old Testament refer to the 10 commandments specifically separate from the
rest of the law and ordinances AFTER they were given? Of course not! Are the 10 given any priority
above the others? Of course not! I challenge anyone to find such a teaching, because they were all
a unit as the law of Moses, just as they are referred to in the New Testament by
Jesus. Ex. 31:23: “The Lord said unto Moses, Write thou these words: for after
the tenor of these words I have made a covenant with thee and with Israel. And he wrote
upon the tablets the words of the covenant, the TEN COMMANDMENTS.” Once we identify the “10 commandments “ with the Mosaic/old covenant which is
“done away” with we can understand which covenant we are to keep. Being in Christ is the deathblow is dealt to the teaching of the 7th Day
Adventists and other Sabbatarian groups. This proves they have no
scriptural justification to continue the practice of the old covenant today (by
obligation). Yet they go to great lengths to deny that this is being taught in
Scripture. They find all the Scriptures that describe certain parts of the law
but will not bring attention to the others that define it. Their only choice is
to divide the law into two sections: The civil and ceremonial. The ceremonial is then attributed Moses and the moral which is from
God. The former, they name the Law of Moses, which was abolished; the latter part
(the ten) they say is the Law of God that still is to be observed today just as
it was when it was given. But the Scriptures never support
this division or practice, it actually states the opposite. The terms “ law of
Moses” and “law of God” are used interchangeably for both the ceremonial and
moral parts of the law (2 Chron.31; Num. 31: 21). A careful study and one finds this
taught in both the Old and New Testament. SDA teach that the Law of Moses was written in a book put outside the ark, and
the Ten Commandments which were inscribed on stone by God were put inside the ark.
The10 have what they consider greater significance because of its positioning. “What God wrote is
eternal what Moses wrote is not.” However, the Ten Commandments were only the first
installment of what is known as the Book of the Law, or the Book of the Covenant.
These were spoken by God from Mount Sinai to the Israelites below. However in Ex.
24:12 Then the LORD said to Moses, “Come up to Me on the mountain and be there;
and I will give you tablets of stone, and the law and commandments which I have
written, that you may teach them.” Here God distinguishes all the facets of
the law yet he is credited for giving it all to Moses. Nehemiah the prophet states
“You came down also on Mount Sinai, and spoke with them from heaven, and gave them
just ordinances and true laws, good statutes and commandments.”
(Neh. 9:13) “So God gave all of the facets of the law which made up the
covenant. When we look at the purpose of the tabernacle the priest was only allowed to enter in once a year. The priests function was related to the ark as he sprinkled the blood of the animal over the mercy seat for the sins of the people who broke the law. The blood was sprinkled over the ark to cover the sins the people of Israel committed. It is not insignificant to see that the tablets of the law was under the blood, since it was the law the people broke. Law keepers would like us to believe the opposite, (that the blood is somehow under the law, in subjection to it, alongside of it or in some way inferior to it), when in all reality the law has been put aside for the new testament believer who is under the blood. All of these are shadows and typology of Christ who would be the eternal high priest and sprinkle his blood over the mercy seat so that we could be forgiven permanently.
The law that was practiced with the priesthood and all that was inside were taken away when the temple was destroyed after Christ came. Without the only place where sacrifices could be made there could be no atonement. Christ came fulfilling the Old Testament types of sacrifice. The very reason God had the temple destroyed is to make it absolutely clear that the priesthood, the law and the sacrifices would be replaced, removed by a single permanent one (Christ.) This is the very
reason only the high priest could enter the temple, the law was in the ark and the
book of the law testified against them. He acted as the mediator for the nation. In the old covenant, there was no hope of eternal life for anybody who broke any
of the laws set down. Can we find any example of Israel keeping the law? No, we see
the exact opposite, they struggled and consistently failed. The law was never intended to bring
salvation or justify someone. Its purpose was not to save, but show how futile it was
to do good works without God's mercy. It was to teach people the need for salvation
in the savior by His grace. Likewise in the New Testament the law can never justify or sanctify
anybody because this is
attributed to the work of Christ through the Holy Spirit. Paul describes the Mosaic covenant in 2 Cor.3: 7. He then identifies the Ten
Commandments with the covenant “done away” in Christ.” God states the law is
temporary, who knows better the 7th day keepers or God? Only the new
covenant is an everlasting Covenant for all people (Heb.13:20). Gal.5:2: “If you receive circumcision you are obligated to keep the entire law.” Why, because it is a complete unit to Israel. What Paul is saying, is that that if one insists on
keeping the letter of the law (the Old Covenant), Christ's sacrifice is of
no use. All 613 laws (which include the Ten Commandments) are inclusive, not just
what one wishes to pick and choose to keep. Paul uses the requirement of
circumcision that
was not one of the 10 but included in the law. In verse 3 he says we
become a debtor to keep the whole law and v.4 states we have fallen from
grace. Biblically, we are left with two choices: (1) Jesus fulfilled the law for us and freed us
from the dominion of the Old Covenant, or (2) we must keep every part of the Old
Covenant. These are our only choices. Rom.3:20: “For through the Law {comes} the knowledge of sin.” This is
the same law Paul speaks about that condemns and makes one guilty, it is the 10
commandments and anything else contrary to God. Paul teaches that the Mosaic covenant was “done away with through Christ” (including the ten commandments as a whole); this is strengthened by the statement of the Law itself. We read that we are not under the law but grace. Paul writes in Romans 7 an illustration of one under the law who is married and when the husband dies she is released to marry another, but if her spouse has not died and ahe is with another she is then committing adultery. V.5 For when we were in the flesh, the sinful passions which were aroused by the law were at work in our members to bear fruit to death. V.6 But now we have been delivered from the law, having died to what we were held by, so that we should serve in the newness of the Spirit and not in the oldness of the letter. V.7 What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Certainly not! On the contrary, I would not have known sin except through the law. For I would not have known covetousness unless the law had said, “You shall not covet.” V.8 But sin, taking opportunity by the commandment, produced in me all manner of evil desire. For apart from the law sin was dead. V.9 I was alive once without the law, but when the commandment came, sin revived and I died. V.10-13 And the commandment, which was to bring life, I found to bring death. For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it killed me. Therefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good. Has then what is good become death to me? Certainly not! But sin, that it might appear sin, was producing death in me through what is good, so that sin through the commandment might become exceedingly sinful." We see here Paul defines the commandments as the 10 which are the law. Their purpose was to produce sin to activate what was already inside us. What Commandment keepers want us to do is put ourselves bondage of the commandments, which only stir up the sin nature. Which is the very purpose why followers of Christ have been given the Holy
Spirit in order to control and change that old nature… Paul declared, “We serve in the new way of the
Spirit, and not in the old way of the written letter” (Rom. 7:6) The writer of Heb.8:7-8 states, “For if that first covenant
had been faultless, then no place would have been sought for a second.
Because finding fault with them, He says: “Behold, the days are coming, says the
Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the
house of Judah.” He’s saying the first covenant is not perfect, not in
itself but because of mankind. Heb 7:11-12: “Therefore, if perfection were through the Levitical priesthood
(for under it the people received the law), what further need was there that another
priest should rise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be called
according to the order of Aaron? For the priesthood being changed, of necessity there
is also a change of the law.” The priests were in charge of the sacrifices,
they made sure the peoples sins would be forgiven. Once the Levitical priesthood was
passé, there was so was no longer a need for continual sacrifices. The whole law
revolved around this system for forgiveness. Therefore the law and mans relationship
to it also changed. Heb. 8:13 “In that He says, “A new covenant,” He has made the
first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish
away.” Here he says the believer is not to be ruled by its dictates, it is
obsolete, put aside, it no longer is our instructor. But it is for those who are
lawless as 1 Tim.1:9 states. Death or Life Rom.7:10-11: “And the commandment, which was to bring life, I found to bring
death. For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it
killed me. The commandment never brought life just the opposite. The Ten Commandments are described as “the ministry of death”! This is because of the relationship in which they are placed in the Mosaic covenant. They were set before Israel with the words: “Cursed is every man that continues not to do all the words of this law” (Deut. 27: 26; Gal. 3: 10). In Deut.27:11 Moses had all of Israel's curses that related to the 10 commandments. In this re-ratifying of the covenant, it broadened the scope of their application. There was no hope of eternal life for anybody who broke any of the laws set down. They did not, nor could not receive salvation by obedience. But in
Christ there is hope of forgiveness. The “Law of Christ” (1 Cor. 9: 21).
Paul reaffirms nine of these commands giving them amplification, and presents a new
meaning to the fourth (the Sabbath law). The new covenant is called the “perfect
law of liberty” in contrast to the covenant of death the ten commandments, because
it can release us from sin and death ( James 2: 8-12), something the Mosaic Covenant
never could do. The10 Commandments, of which the law of the Sabbath is the fourth, were written
by the finger of God on tablets of stone. These commandments are called the
“ministry of death” and the “ministry of condemnation,” “written and
engraved in stone” (2 Corinthians 3:7,9), which ministry, the HOLY SPIRIT tells
us, is “passing away” and is “abolished” (verses 11,13), in its place we
have the “ministry of the Spirit” and “the ministry of righteousness”
(verses 8,9). The 10 commandments are referred to collectively only twice in the New Testament, in Heb. 9:1-4 and 2 Cor. 3 as the TABLETS OF THE COVENANT.” In Heb. 8:13 God says, “A new covenant,” He has made the first obsolete this he refers to the 10 commandments. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.” In Heb. 9:1-4 The author continues by describing what would fade, saying “… Now even the first covenant had ordinance of divine service and the earthly sanctuary” he then goes and describes the tabernacle showing its relationship to the old covenant, vs.4 the tables of the covenant.” II King 23:3:
“Then the king stood by a pillar and made a covenant before the LORD, to follow
the LORD and to keep His commandments and His testimonies and His statutes,
with all his heart and all his soul, to perform the words of this covenant that
were written in this book.” You cannot find in the Old Testament any reference to the 10
commandments specifically separate from the rest of the law and ordinances after
they were first given. Because they were all a unit as the law of Moses, just as
they are referred to in the New Testament. The covenant was written in the book. Remember the
book of the law (Deuteronomy) contained the 10 commandments also (Deut.5) Where is the Ark now? Gone like the Old Testament priesthood and sacrifices. Its removal is proof of what the Scripture says, that the whole old covenant has faded away. If the covenant and the ark are gone, doesn’t it make sense that the sign which is the Sabbath would be gone also. The whole tabernacle was destroyed in 70 A.D. not just the holy place but everything in it, the book of the law, the ark and the 10 commandments are all gone as well, God made a point with the Sacrifice of Jesus being the way. Zechariah 11:10 says “And I took my staff, beauty and cut it in two, that I
might break the covenant which I had made with all the peoples. So it was broken on
that day.” When did this occur? “thus the poor of the flock, who were watching
me, knew that it was the word of the Lord.12 Then I said to them, if it is agreeable
to you, give me my wages and if not refrain.” So they weighed out for my wages 30
pieces of silver.” God is clear, He changed the covenant. Both The ten commandments (tablets) and the ordinances are part of the first
covenant which was replaced by the greater new covenant. Heb.9:4 which had the
golden censer and the ark of the covenant overlaid on all sides with gold, in
which were the golden pot that had the manna, Aaron's rod that budded, and the tablets
of the covenant; vs.8 explains why the first tabernacle was taken away so we can
enter into the holy of holies, he then explains the priestly duties and in vs.11
tells us Christ is the greater tabernacle vs.15 he becomes the mediator of the new
covenant Instead of the law, the tabernacle and Old Testament sacrifices. Heb. 9:8-11: “the
Holy Spirit indicating this, that the way into the Holiest of All was not yet made
manifest while the first tabernacle was still standing. It was symbolic for
the present time in which both gifts and sacrifices are offered which cannot make
him who performed the service perfect in regard to the conscience…V.11 But Christ
came as High Priest of the good things to come, with the greater and more perfect
tabernacle not made with hands, that is, not of this creation.” The whole
tabernacle was removed, it was symbolic and unless it was taken out of the way we
could not enter in through the veil which was the true tabernacle his flesh. He
ripped the veil. Heb.10 so we can enter in to his presence directly without any of
the functions of the Old Testament covenant. The glory of the law was temporary it
was to be replaced by something greater, something permanent. Christ replaced it all. 2 Corinthians 3:2-11 also proves The Old covenant
were the 10 commandments which were called Moses' law. The Old Covenant was written on tablets of stone, and ink (the book of law where all the laws were written for the priest to access outside the ark). The New Covenant Written by the Spirit of the living God, written on tablets of flesh, that is, of the heart, not on stone. (Thus we are living epistles). This is exactly what
law Paul is referring to in Rom.7:6-12: “But now we have been delivered from the
law, having died to what we were held by, so that we should serve in the newness
of the Spirit and not in the oldness of the letter.”( compare this with
Ex.34:27,1 Kings 8:9,21: 9,Deut.4:13, 9:9, 2 Chron.6:11) Vs.6-7 Old Covenant of the letter that kills, ministry of death condemning us to die, Written on tablets of stone, it was glorious but passing away, Moses face shined only. Exactly what Rom.7: 10 states, “And the commandment, which was to bring life, I found to bring death”. The New is of the Spirit, God
himself replacing the old with the new that gives life, it is a Ministry of righteousness. 2
Cor.3:8: if you have the spirit you don’t need the letter because it becomes a
relationship. Only certain people had the Holy Spirit in the Old Testament kings, high
priests, and prophets. In the New Covenant the Holy Spirit is for all who believe. Now Paul's statement in Rom. 7:6 becomes crystal clear, “But now we have been
released from the Law, having died to that by which we were bound, so that we serve
in newness of the Spirit and not in oldness of the letter.” In Ex.34:29-35 when Moses came down from the Mt. with the tablets of testimony he
had a veil over his face but when he went before the Lord he took the veil off. In 2
Cor.3:7-11 Paul describes this; but if the ministry of death, written and engraved
on stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not look steadily at
the face of Moses because of the glory of his countenance, which glory was passing
away, how will the ministry of the Spirit not be more glorious? For if the
ministry of condemnation had glory, the ministry of righteousness exceeds much more
in glory. For even what was made glorious had no glory in this respect, because of
the glory that excels. For if what is passing away was glorious, what remains is
much more glorious. V.13 unlike Moses, who put a veil over his face so that the
children of Israel could not look steadily at the end of what was passing away.
V.14 But their minds were blinded. For until this day the same veil remains unlifted
in the reading of the Old Testament, because the veil is taken away in Christ. Paul
is stating that if one looks toward the old they cannot see Christ fully but if they
look toward Christ the old fades away. V.15 But even to this day, when Moses is
read, a veil lies on their heart. V.16 Nevertheless when one turns to the
Lord, the veil is taken away. V.17 Now the Lord is the Spirit; and where the
Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty. V.18 But we all, with unveiled face,
beholding as in a mirror the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same
image from glory to glory, just as by the Spirit of the Lord. Paul goes on in the next chapter continuing to use the concept of the veil for
the gospel. 2 Cor. 4:3-4: “But even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those
who are perishing, whose minds the god of this age has blinded, who do not believe,
lest the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God,
should shine on them.” To summarize the Old Covenant a Ministry of death, written and engraved on stones
was glorious and yet was passing away, it was only temporary. The New Covenant is the Ministry of the Spirit, More glorious, exceeds much more
in glory, Remains everlasting. (Heb.13:20) Hebrews 8:7-13 the author is quoting
Jer.31:31 that even from his day “Now even the first covenant was the tablet and is
vanishing away.” Just as Moses veil was, this comparison is made to show the
old glory of the law would eventually fade to be replaced with a greater glory God
himself. The substance would be the permanent replacement for the law that was only
temporary. Heb 10:1: “For the law, having a shadow of the good things to come, and
not the very image of the things, can never with these same sacrifices, which they
offer continually year by year, make those who approach perfect. Heb. 10:9: “then He said, “Behold, I have come to do Your will, O God.” He
takes away the first that He may establish the second.” The Fathers
will was to put aside the first covenant so that mankind could receive the 2nd
and have power to live the life He intended for us empowered by His Spirit. Rom. 8:1-4: “There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus, who do not walk according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit.” “ For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and of death For what the Law could not do, weak as it was through the flesh, God {did:} sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and {as an offering} for sin, He condemned sin in the flesh, in order that the requirement of the Law might be fulfilled in us, who do not walk according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit”. The law had a purpose but notice what the law could and could not do! It cannot justify, it cannot change a heart of a sinner, it can only make one guilty, it can’t pardon or redeem or save. It was the weakness of the flesh that prevented it, so it can only bring conviction, guilt and the curse. What it could not accomplish the Son of God did by condemning sin in the flesh and fulfilled it himself, because he alone could live the law perfectly and did. That is why our focus is Christ not the law. If we are not under law, our sin cannot be held against us. Rom.10:4-5 Truly “ Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.” Our new life begins and ends in Christ not in the Old Covenant of law. for more on the New Covenant >click here |
|