|
|
|
|
A Mans False interpretation of God’s Holy Eternal Word Interpreting and understanding Bible prophecy is done by a consistent method and procedure of gathering all that the prophets spoke, using primarily a literal method for interpretation. For even the symbolism they used represents what is literal, real events. If not approached this way, one is not going to be accurate.
Also:
To be interpreting prophecy correctly one must be accurate on the core doctrines.
Mike Adams who had become a bible teacher basically overnight, who is into correcting the churches flaws, says to his audience,“you are far more accomplished bible scholars than I.” If that is so, why then how is he teaching them? To his credit, at least he reads the Bible out loud, but what people should take notice of are his interpretations that follow, which do not coincide with what he reads; he alters the words and leads you away from the truth of the Word. Adams also says,“The tribulation may be happening now, we may be entering it now, or it may be around the corner.’In his introduction of John the apostle, he says, “If indeed he is the author here” (Mike Adams Sermon 050). John is not the author? His teaching on prophecy could be the very worst I have ever heard from anyone in all of history. The confirmation of Scripture as truth is continually questioned by him, especially on Paul, But this is John, an apostle, and on this too, he has people doubting. Understand, Adams scoffs, mocks, and questions those who quote scripture on Jesus literally coming back to earth from heaven as he promised in the Word. He teaches, “we are now exercising with conscious choice in order to oppose, defeat, and dismantle the powers of evil and darkness that are trying to conquer our world, and that if we stand strong with each other, then we shall defeat those forces of darkness.” (001 Ephesians 6.11 and the Armor of God at the MOLECULAR level) No, we do not defeat worldwide evil that will continue to grow; Jesus does by his return. Adams does not believe this; he does not teach that Jesus returns; especially to save anyone. Instead, he teaches that all of Earth will be destroyed by comets,that“God sends a comet that has a name that refers to God that actually strikes the earth and ends all evil”(068.) Jesus describes the end as so intense “such as has not been since the beginning of the world until this time, no, nor ever shall be. And unless those days were shortened, no flesh would be saved” Matt 24:21-22. Mark 13:19 describes this time as “has not been from the beginning of creation, nor will ever be again.” This is why we are to look to his coming (Titus 2:13). “Christians tell me insistently that Jesus will return to earth riding out of the sky on a white horse to save humankind and defeat evil. Now, perhaps you've heard this story… you've been taught this story… you believe this story. Okay. Maybe you were taught this since you were a child and you never questioned it because everybody else around you also said the same thing. Yeah, of course Jesus comes out of the sky on a white horse.” “All right, but continuing my tweet. And when I asked them to cite the scripture where it says that, none of them can. Not one of them. Not one. Why? Because the Bible doesn't say that at all. That is nowhere in the Bible. I've read it and I've searched it and I've checked. Doesn't exist in the Bible. And I checked the full Ethiopian Bible with all 88 books. Not in there either …” ( My job is to help you FREE YOUR MIND from delusions and myths) But it is there, it’s just he won’t accept it for Jesus’ name is not mentioned but the descriptions of him are. And, it would interfere with his story of comets destroying the world and everyone in it. Yes, his title ‘free (loose) your mind’ means from the Word of God to his private interpretation of prophecy that the bible warns not to have. Speaking of Rev.19 “Jesus isn't mentioned in the entire chapter.”Lets see if that is true Rev. 19:11-14 He who sat on him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness He judges and makes war. His eyes were like a flame of fire, and on His head were many crowns. He had a name written that no one knew except Himself. He was clothed with a robe dipped in blood, and His name is called The Word of God.” Frist is that Jesus is called the Word (Jn.1:1 and is used throughout his gospel, and so he is identified here. Jesus is also called faithful (Rev.1:5)and true (1 jn.5:20; Rev.3:7). His eyes are like flames of fire speaking of Jesus in Rev.1:14. It says ‘he’ has a robe dipped in blood, spoken of the messiahs return in Isa. 63:1-4 speaks of the glorious one who returns whose garments like one who treads in the winepress ? “their blood is sprinkled upon My garments, and I have stained all My robes.” Rev 19:16 and on His robe The one who sits on the horse, and on His thigh a name written: KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS. (Rev.17:14; 1Timothy 6:15). That is Jesus, not a comet! So Adams purposely twists prophesy doing exactly what John warns of not to do, (Rev.22:18) change the words. Who needs more books when you can’t teach accurately from what you already have? Adams goes outside the recognized Bible that has been accepted since the early church to include spurious books. Did he check the gospel according to Levi Dowling (new age), or the book of Mormon, or any of the gnostic gospels to make sure they too are included? Why not? You have to be biblically grounded to be able to judge whether a book should be in the bible or not. The Gnostic gospels were all rejected, as were these books that he says are included in the Ethiopian Bibleby the early church closest to the time of the apostles. This man certainly qualifies as one of the last days mockers of Jude 18, and scoffers 2 Pt.3. He constantly brings into question the Bible, but he does not do this for other religious books or teachings which he uses as being from God. “The Roman Catholic Church,… hijacked Christianity in so many ways and tried to squash the writings of Thomas …” The Roman Church did many things wrong but this is not one of them. The early church rejected Thomas gospel before Roman Catholicism was even established. The Gospel of Thomas and the Acts of Thomas are Gnostic, enemies of Christ. An example of this: Jesus said, "When you see one who was not born of woman, prostrate yourselves on your faces and worship him. That one is your Father." Jesus said, "It is I who am the light which is above them all. It is I who am the All. From me did the All come forth, and unto me did the All extend. Split a piece of wood, and I am there. Lift up the stone” Jesus said, "I myself shall lead her in order to make her male, so that she too may become a living spirit resembling you males. For every woman who will make herself male will enter the Kingdom of Heaven." It is to Thomas that Jesus reaffirmed he was physically alive, “look at My hands; and reach your hand here, and put it into My side. Do not be unbelieving, but believing." (John 20:27). But Adams fully denies physical resurrection, so who is rejecting the writings of Thomas? He is.
Adams states,“Even though we're teaching from the Bible, the words in the Bible are consistent with the words from other writings and other prophets and other wise men or wise people across the planet. Maybe other sons of God ,I'm bringing in other cultures and other mythos, other religions. And I intend to teach from many different books.”He Mentions the Quran, “which also prophesies the end of the earth in exactly the same way as the book of Revelation. It's all there…all these books teach the same thing, the exact same thing.” (102 - God issued his END TIMES warning) No, they are not the exact same thing. Anyone who puts time into an honest study of comparative religions knows this. “Nowhere does it say you have to memorize Scripture in order to enter heaven...And the other important point to realize is that the Bible is not always the Bible.” (2025 Easter Sunday special message from the Health Ranger: God DESTROYS all human life on Earth) underline mine True, you don’t have to memorize it, but you certainly have to understand it, which he does not. What he is doing is destroying people's faith, not building their faith up in the truth of the Word. How important is the bible? Adams explains, “ But we're going to wipe your memory just to see if you can figure this out. But we're going to give you a user guide. It's called the Bible. If you read it, you'll figure things out. If you don't read it, you'll never have a clue. ….And even if you read the Bible, we're going to write it in riddles.So you have to be really, really dedicated to try to figure it out. … we're going to make it so bizarre that only the best of the best can figure it out.” (064 - After planetary WIPEout) Whose the we? Does God writes it in riddles, and not in plain sense? Apparently you have to be braniac like him to figure your way out from the illusion that he calls ‘a simulation.’ Yet he will say, “I don't exclude people of other faiths just because they don't read from the same book that I read from and teach from.” (Mike Adams 020 - Churchery TREACHERY.) Then how do they get free of the simulation? Adams not only has inconsistencies in the Scripture but also in his own philosophy. As far as Adams is concerned, “the history of the Bible, is steeped in politics and the government collusion and popularity contests, all kinds of things.So whose writings made it into the Bible? Well, sometimes it was by merit, sometimes it was by luck, sometimes it was by a popularity contest. And that's how Paul nudged his way into dominating so much of the New Testament, even though he basically was an Antichrist figure.”(103 - Romans 13 - Paul was a DECEIVER) There was no luck involved. When it comes to God’s sovereignty, he arranged it. Does God have control over his word to be accurate? He certainly does. And as far as Paul, he was used by God in ways Adams could only dream of. The Bible is inaccurate “There's more to the story.” He says this over and over “Did you know there are at least 22 books MISSING from the Bible you've been taught? The Ethopian Christian Bible has 88 books, not the 66 found in western Christian Bibles. If you're wondering where those 22 missing books went, they were censored on purpose in order to hide them from Christians. What are those books about? Things like giants. … Because the way Christianity is taught in the modern western world is largely a stack of lies and censorship to prevent you from knowing the truth that God wants you to know.” (X post by Adams on April 22, 2023) Does Adam think he knows the truth while all of us in the western civilization do not? Yes, he thinks so and continues to say so. “And did you know that the Bible that most people in the West read, it's missing a bunch of books? …Because the Ethiopian Bible, for example, has, I think, 88 books. A lot of the books that were removed from the Western Christian Bibles because the people that structured it didn't want you to know about those things. You know, like giants that walked the earth. Yeah, they don't want you to know about that.”(2025 Easter Sunday special message from the Health Ranger) Nearly everyone has read of the giants in Gen.6 and later in the land. He makes this like some type of church conspiracy, like the ones he finds in the government which he majors on. In fact, he puts down the bible nearly as much as he does Christians and the Church. The Bible says “ all Scripture is given by inspiration of God …” (2 Tim. 3:16.) His answer of why the Bible can’t be trusted, “most of the Bible was written by Jewish scribes, who we know can't be trusted.” Why? Because, “They're the ones who called for the murder of Christ.” (2025 Easter sermon) Again his bias gets in his way of understanding. The New Testament which he is referring to here was written by the apostles themselves or legates appointed by them. So he applied what he thinks of Jews in the Old testament to the New testament, showing how incapable he is to discern. He makes this clear stating “I tell you what I do trust. I do trust the words of Jesus, and that's why I'm going to narrow my faith-based understanding of the Bible to the words of Jesus alone. Everybody else, I'm going to take with a grain of salt. Does that seem reasonable? I mean, if we are Christians, shouldn't we put the words of Christ first? Or are we Paulyans? …Don't call yourself a Christian. If you're a Paulyan, you're a follower of Paul. … so let's always read the Bible critically , and let's be very careful what sources we trust in this, knowing that this is the history of the Bible, is steeped in politics and the government collusion and popularity contests , all kinds of things. And then, above all, today in our world, don't believe what Paul said. Don't think that authority comes from government.” (103 - Romans 13 - Paul was a DECEIVER) If 13 books of Paul are not supposed to be there, what about all these other 22 books he added? Does not the Ethiopian Bible contain Paul's letters too? It certainly does. So he should have a problem with it also, that is, if his logic was consistent. Adams has decidedly become the interpreter of Gods word and decides what books are God’s word, he makes no sense. “if we read the Bible blindly, then we're trusting a bunch of unknown people who chose to assemble certain books and scrolls and passages into the Bible, and we're trusting translations that we have no control over. I tell you what I do trust. I do trust the words of Jesus, and that's why I'm going to narrow my faith-based understanding of the Bible to the words of Jesus alone. Everybody else, I'm going to take with a grain of salt…” (103 - Romans 13 - Paul was a DECEIVER.) Yet he reads from James and Peter? What’s left after Paul is rejected? You some of Acts, James, Peter and John, all of whom endorsed Paul (he doesn’t). Yet he says this is the book necessary to release you from the simulation? Jesus did not write any of his words, we received them from the eyewitnesses, the writers he chose to convey the message through those who wrote the gospels and the letters. But Adams says you can’t trust what they say, trust what he says about them, which is what cults do. Adams is asked how to expand our perspective with regards to the Bible. Adams: "I would start by saying that I have encountered quite a few people who can recite a lot of Scripture, but they have a very rigid interpretation of the Bible, which is that this is it. This is complete. Nothing else is possible. And sometimes they're very anything that even smacks of a new age type of terminology might trigger some of these people. I run into that as well.” (Spiritual People Need To Prepare The New INSPIRED Mike Adams Interview by John Nolans timestamp 18:20) Imagine calling those who hold to the narrow way, Scripture alone as new age. The audacity this man has. It’s not rigid to be holding to a literal understanding of what Jesus spoke, But Adams wants people to open their minds to other teachings beyond the word, which is dangerous, for he teaches what IS New age. Reciting does not help if you do not understand what it means. In Adams' case, he does not have an understanding of the most basic core teachings of Christ. In other words, forget Jesus saying, on being a learner is by keeping to his word alone. John 14:23 "If anyone loves Me, he will keep My word,” Meaning the words Jesus spoke and the prophets words which came to fulfill(Mt.5:17; Lk.24:44) V.24“He who does not love Me does not keep My words.”There is a principle given for wisdom Prov. 30:6, “Do not add to His words, Lest He rebuke you, and you be found a liar.” As far as his trust in God's word, he entirely rejects the apostle who was chosen by Jesus to go to the Gentiles. Instead Paul nudged his way into dominating so much of the New Testament, even though he basically was an Antichrist figure.” “Paul, he elbowed his way into a very dominant position in the Bible, contradicting the Gospels, … and that he is not faithful to the teachings of Christ” “Paul just kind of went off and appointed himself and then just kind of scammed everybody and that's how he ended up in the Bible”(103 - Romans 13 - Paul was a DECEIVER) “Now Paul was also a false teacher on the issue of faith versus works, whereas Jesus always taught WORKS! (103 Romans 13) Because he is unable to interpret the words of James and Paul correctly he comes to this unbiblical conclusion. Where does Jesus say your work has saved you? Nowhere. A woman washed Jesus’ feet with her tears and wiped them with the hair of her head. Anointed his head and feet with oil. And Jesus said to her, "Your sins are forgiven." And He said to the woman, " Your faith has saved you. Go in peace." Luke 7:44-8:1. Jesus also said to another woman (numerous times recorded) “your faith has made you well. Speaking of PaulAdams’ claims Paul said,“….I 'm the lead apostle. I'm the one true chosen apostle. That's not the way Jesus saw it. So we have to be really careful about this, understanding that a lot of the Bible is actually false teachings. … you can only understand this, though, after you start to really, I think, study it and read it and have some discernment about the politics behind the Bible. How were these books chosen? How were these chapters chosen? ”(103 - Romans 13) Paul did not say what Adams’ falsely accuses him of. Paul records this in 1 Cor. 15:9of himself “I am the least of the apostles, who am not worthy to be called an apostle, ”and Eph. 3:8 “ am less than the least of all the saints, this grace was given, that I should preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ.” Adams’ is not only saying books were purposely omitted but chapters also, its politics. Which means the apostles who wrote the words were involved in being false witnesses. He I manipulating people to doubt what is true. “we can't just simply look at it as, hey, this is a book written by God. That's not at all true . The Bible is a book that is an assembly of many, many different writings, obviously spanning many thousands of years from many different authors. And there are parts that are, of course, intentionally dropped out of the Bible, a nd there are certain chapters that are chosen to be in the Bible. And then the Bible, of course, gets translated over time … It's not 100% loyal to the original languages. And of course, the original languages are many different languages. Sometimes it's Hebrew, sometimes Arabic, sometimes Greek , what have you, right? So, you know, Latin, sometimes we don't even know for sure what the original verses said. What I want you to understand is that the Bible is as much a political document as it is a spiritual recording… these 66 books are not verbatim the Word of God” 103 - Romans 13) First, there is no Arabic (we find Aramaic in just a few paragraphs of the Old Testament, which is 99% + Hebrew). And there is no original Latin. Adams shows how uneducated he is in these simple matters but he speaks as if he knows what he is teaching is true. He speaks of “discernment about the politics behind the Bible. How were these books chosen? How were these chapters chosen? … other scribes faithfully reproduced the scrolls. …we didn't have the printing press then either. So this is a tedious task. So whose writings made it into the Bible? (103 - Romans 13 - Paul was a DECEIVER) So you can’t trust what you read is accurate that you need to have. So exactly how does one honestly teach in faith (trust) from such a flawed book that they find disingenuous? He chooses what is right for you adding another religion. “from so many prophets in the Old Testament and the New and the Book of Revelation, ...It's in the Quran too, if you follow Islam. Same thing, same thing in the Quran.” ( 89 - Psalm 75) “ I've already quoted from the Quran, which also prophesies the end of the earth in exactly the same way as the book of Revelation. It's all there.” (102 - God issued his END TIMES warning) No it does not.“Islam says that the Quran is just the third part of the Bible. You got the Old Testament that the Jews practice. You've got the New Testament that the Christians believe. And then you got the newer part written like six centuries later, which is Islam with Muhammad … you'll find out the Quran and the Book of Revelation have a lot in common.” (085 John ch14- Is CHRIST the only pathway to Heaven?) Trying to convince the church of using the Quran, “And then you got the newer part written like six centuries later, which is Islam with Muhammad. So people of Islam say, well, God sent another prophet or another savior, Muhammad. See? So folks, gotta open your mind a little bit about what God's capable of.” (085 John ch14- Is CHRIST the only pathway to Heaven?) If you open you mind like his you will become as confused as he is. Adams states, “… I don't go to other churches and hear their interpretation. I prefer to read the Bible. I just read the Bible. I don't want a pastor or preacher from a mainstream church to tell me what they think the Bible says when I can just read it myself. Of course, you may say, well, Mike, you're telling us what you think. Indeed, I am, and encouraging you to read it yourself .” (013-leviticus-1711-gods-purebloods.) He is a self taught with no biblical methodology of interpretation, he reinterprets the writers original intent all by himself, constantly putting a spin on its meanings, embellishing or abusing it. And If anyone did attend a sound biblical church he may find out how wrong he is, he tells them how he avoids it. And if you challenge his interpretations well, he rises up “And the level of denial and delusion is really, it's comical because I've had people say, well, I don't read the Bible like that. Or I don't read Revelation that way. Okay, so are you making up your own words then? Because I'm reading the words. I, I suppose you can have delusions of anything that you read and you can make it up. And you can say that that's what's written, but it's not. I'm reading the words that are actually there and the people that say, I don't read it that way. I don't know, what are you reading then? I mean, we should be reading the same text.” (God already RESET planet Earth in Days of Noah, proving he’ll unleash mass killings to defeat evil.) Adams will say, “don't trust what I'm saying here. Read it.” But if you read it and determine he is wrong then he says “Anytime that I cover a book out of the Bible I always encourage you to read it and you know how much I despise the pastors that say well you don't need to read the Bible just listen to my version you know it's just my version and I'm like please read the Bible please read it.” (079 - Daniel Ch. 7 - Is the BEAST a symbol of Zionism? God destroys Israel and ends evil with the 666 weapon) This is his justification of doing what he does, as shown throughout this and the other articles. As he reinterprets the writer, constantly putting a spin on its meanings, embellishing and abusing it. After all, when all of life is seen as a simulation you can make it all up as you go, to form your own reality. Don’t listen to a pastors version, Isn’t that what he is asking them to do? It most certainly is. Listen to him. There’s more according to Adams… much more. The bible says not to put your trust in man, it is especially important that we test what is being taught; test the spirits. He says “the Bible can either enslave you, or it can set you free, depending on how much you understand.”(100 James Ch 2) And what exactly does he understand correctly? “most people only know three or four pieces of scripture that they just cite over and over again and they don't know what came before it and they don't know what comes after it .” (My job is to free your mind) I disagree; I would consider anyone far better off if they only know three or four pieces accurately than the dozens and dozens of scriptures he inaccurately teaches, as he claims 'it is his job to free your mind.' From what? From scriptural truth, replacing it with his own interpretation.
|
|
